What Does the ROK Election Mean for North Korea?
by Richardson ~ December 18th, 2007. Filed under: Engagement, Korean Politics.Tomorrow (19 December) South Korea will hold presidential elections and, if the polls can be trusted, it looks like the former mayor of Seoul and Hyundai Construction businessman Lee Myung-bak (이명박) will win.
Unfortunately – and bizarrely, considering the nuclear test was little over a year ago and concentration camps are still operating – North Korea has not been a major campaign issue during this election cycle. North Korean defectors living in South Korea are bitterly disappointed after 10 years of what they consider betrayal by Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun. Defectors generally prefer conservative candidates and call for regime change in North Korea.
Lee Hoi Chang (이회창), who narrowly lost to Roh Moo-hyun (노무현) in December 2002, would have been the candidate for defectors. However, Lee, who is running as an independent after failing to secure the nomination of the conservative Grand National Party (GNP), has been steadily loosing ground after an initially respectable entry into the race. If North Korea’s reaction is anything to go by, Lee Hoi Chang is who I would select.
The likely winner, Lee Myung-bak, is the GNP candidate and was previously more hawkish towards engagement with North Korea. Perhaps to moderate fanatically pro-engagement leftists, Lee altered his position to and called for engagement with North Korea through investment rather than direct aid. Basically from the “Sunshine Policy” to something of a “Sun-Lite” policy.
On the surface it appears that North Korea will still have engagement options, but less no-strings aid. However, considering that North Korea often demands aid before granting South Korea the privilege of engaging, I wonder if Lee’s approach will last long, perhaps giving him the excuse to fall back on a more hard-line approach.


December 18th, 2007 at 3:49 pm
I think the North will be pleased with a Lee victory in part. They won’t have to keep putting up with the Roh begging them to give him some face-saving jesture for all the aid and geopolitical bending over backward Seoul has done the last 10 years. For example, I doubt you’ll see Lee begging for Kim Jong Il to fulfill his promise and come to Seoul for a summit or keep the begging going to the point that Roh says he is even willing to go back to the Pyongyang just to get a 2nd summit…
I expect Lee will just quietly give North Korea as much aid as he thinks it needs to stay alive…
December 19th, 2007 at 9:53 am
I think that’s right, until North Korea does something stupid. Lee fits nicely with strategic disengagement - he’ll give them enough to keep afloat, but won’t try to hyper-engage them like Roh did. Still, if North Korea tries brinksmanship Lee could get tougher with them. I do expect to see U.S.-ROK relations improve.