For North Korean Defectors, “Incomprehensible South Korea”
by Richardson ~ August 3rd, 2007. Filed under: Defectors & Refugees, Korean Culture, Korean Politics.The Daily NK notes that many of the little things we take for granted confuse the average North Korean defector, at first (H/T to Kyochan). An excellent point about South Korea’s left-wing, pro-DPRK government is bolded below:
There are things about South Korea which are incomprehensible to the eyes of defectors.
[. . .]
Greetings have only been thought of as signs of obedience and submission in the North, but in South Korea, the fact that it is just a sign of familiarity, gentleness and goodness makes the defectors puzzled.
[. . .]
Further, defectors are not accustomed to smiling, so are not very good at greeting strangers. To North Koreans . . . smiling belongs the lower hierarchy and dignity to the upper hierarchy.
South Korea is a service society where anyone can easily give and receive smiles, but in North Korea, only in personal relations can citizens exchange smiles, so defectors have seriously mistaken smiling South Koreans who approach them as having an interest in them.
[. . .]
In addition, carefree parking of cars on the street has been a source of befuddlement for the defectors. In North Korea, too many cars do not exist. To leave such a precious possession outside is to say to thieves to take the car.
[. . .]
Consequently, in North Korea, not only private individuals but also national organizations have their exclusive parking spots and leave two or three locks on thick steel doors. Even if cars are parked for ten minutes, the owners buy human locks and leave them standing by, even then, people tend to secretly enter central party organizations unbeknownst to the guards and rip parts off of perfectly fine cars. As a result, North Korean cars do not have modeled car accessories. The outer form is a Toyota, but the engine is a Bentz and the tires are different and even the back mirrors or logos are stolen from other cars.
Next is the South Korea’s culture of waste. In North Korea, one meal per day is the source of sustenance. To North Koreans, the purpose of life not to live, but to survive. The evening meal symbolizes the day’s peace, blessing, and health. However, that is not enough for South Koreans, so they gluttonously eat and drink second or third round even besides dinners. North Koreans eat to survive, but South Koreans seem to live to eat.
Perhaps for that reason, it is difficult to understand the nightlife of South Korea. In North Korea, after the nighttime meal, the evening looks even more bleak with worries about the next day. It is a country where there is nothing to see and do and with the shortage of electricity, melancholic streets become empty around 10pm.
[. . .]
To describe “incomprehensible Korea,” seen from the eyes of defectors, would be endless. However, while living in Korea, they have assimilated and their kaleidoscopic experiences have become old stories.
Nonetheless, there is still one thing which cannot be understood, which is South Korea’s left-wing pro-North Korea influence. North Korea is a live model of why the socialist regime should never be repeated in human history.
A reason exists for this reality. However, sympathizing with the unjustifiable, the unprecedented, unhumanitarian country of North Korea and its regime is humanly psychologically disturbing. They try to explain and disguise their illness with protection of peace, humanitarianism, strategic approach, and other fancy words, but they themselves do not realize their misunderstanding of peace, human rights, and strategy. South Korea is such a diverse society, so can such pro-North Korea ignorance get through? (emphasis added)



August 5th, 2007 at 4:39 pm
I pondered this question Richardson, and for the life of me cannot understand why the south would be pro-DPRK. I mean is that why the country was split to begin with? Have some people forgotten why it was split?
Here is an interesting interview from a person who runs an unground railroad:
http://www.crosswalk.com/news/religiontoday/11549735/
Yes, this has a Christian/conservative point of view (which I do not mind, but a note nonetheless), but this person sees this stuff first hand and is in the muck of trying to help defectors which is pretty darn admirable in my view.
It is also interesting to note the following question:
“In general, how do South Koreans view U.S. policy toward North Korea?
The public generally has no particular view toward the U.S. policy for North Korea, because they don’t care enough. Those in the minority who do care are evenly split between pro-U.S. and anti-U.S./pro-Kim Jong Il in almost every way. ”
Which echoes the same sentiment in the quote you posted. I still do not understand why anybody would be sympathetic to the North Korean cause.
August 5th, 2007 at 6:51 pm
A lot of revisionist history since the 1980s (e.g., the 386 generation), with great support from the teachers unions, has helped shift the nation. But one of the major shifts towards being more pro-DPRK, or at least not virulently against North Korea, came with Kim Dae-jung’s summit with Kim Jong-il in June 2000; that was a watershed event.
In a nutshell, I think it’s utopian optimism gone wild. In the past year and a half it has slackened a good bit (nuclear test, multiple missiles tests, zero results from the “Sunshine Policy”), and if the next president is conservative the pendulum could complete the swing back to reality.
I think the South Korean population does have a generally negative view of U.S. policy towards North Korea, and many, especially the young, believe that U.S. policy is in fact that cause of all their problems. Such a view is of course delusional, but nonetheless there. Among the older and quickly fading generation there is strong support for the U.S.
August 5th, 2007 at 8:07 pm
Kim Dae-jung got a noble prize for the meeting? wtf?
August 5th, 2007 at 8:11 pm
Considering he also allowed ~half a billion US$ to go to North Korea – a condition imposed by Kim Jong-il, a fact not fully revealed until several years later – he actually purchased his prize.