Political and Personality Introspection

by Richardson ~ March 4th, 2007. Filed under: Miscellaneous.

If you’ve every wanted to quantify or examine your political preferences and personality, there are a few online tests that do this in a general way.

Kevin Kim recently blogged about the Political Compass test, which scores for left/right and authoritarian/libertarian. Somewhat surprisingly, I scored very centrist (economic left/right: 1.38, social libertarian/authoritarian: 0.46):

For personality, there is an online test based on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test. Four sets of dichotomies, with each possibility assigned a letter of the alphabet, are used to create 16 “types” of personality.

  • Introvert (i) and Extravert (e)
  • Sensing (s) and Intuition (n)
  • Thinking (t) and Feeling (f)
  • Judging (j) and Perceiving (p)

Not surprisingly, I scored INTJ (also see this), as I’ve been doing consistently ever since taking the test, aside from a couple INTX (between J and P) results several years ago. My best friend is an ENTJ.

These tests are of course not perfect, and several problems are readily apparent. The Political Compass test, for example, has several questions that may be objectively true, but that does not necessarily mean that one prefers that option. For example, one question is:

A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system.

Technically, I would say that is true, but that does not mean I would want or support that type of government, and I note that the advantage could turn around if poor choices are made. Other questions form the same sort of problem and may skew results. If I took the test again, I would probably score slightly more to the right and authoritarian.

Myers-Briggs also has its share of criticisms, but it’s still interesting and entertaining to see what they have to say.

15 Responses to Political and Personality Introspection

  1. usinkorea

    There weren’t any foreign policy type questions that I remember. I almost had a bull’s eye - I was on the dividing line of left-right and just slightly toward libertarian. I am rather conservative in my personal views and actions but prefer society prevents groups of individuals from telling us what our actions and views should be.

    Two parts of the Bible (Christian) that stood out for me from a young age were the story of the quiet man who went into the church and quietly prayed at the back and left contrasted with the hypocrit who prayed long and loud for show — and the other was the splinter in the other man’s eye and the plank in your own…

    Next, I used to be fairly democrat on domestic policy - back when the democrats were the party for the working class and not the elitist fringe - but on foreign policy I’ve been rather conservative (but not of the isolationist sort).

    I’ll be interested in seeing what the personality test says for me — because I generally go in cycles year to year. I doubt the test will be able to show much…

  2. James Na

    I took this test a few years back, and I was strongly right economically and socially libertarian. Today, however, I am less libertarian (I guess I turned more authoritarian as I aged). My score is now: Economic Left/Right: 7.88, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72.

    In other words, I am strongly right on economics and slightly libertarian.

    Nonetheless, I am comfortable describing myself as a political conservative in American sense, which is to say I strongly support limited government, free enterprise, strong national defense and traditional moral values.

    The last time I took the psych test, I was ENTJ (strongly E, N, T and J). I have always been ENTJ for years. Now it seems I am INTJ! I am now slightly I, strongly N, moderately T and strongly J). Hmmm…

  3. usinkorea

    http://www.usinkorea.org/Political_Compass_Printable_Graph.mht

    I did the psych test, but the computer ate it, then I didn’t feel like doing it over after having felt the questions weren’t great. I thought the same on the political compass, but gave it shot and it worked.

    I noticed Richardson and I are pretty much right together and both almost dead center. Since we know each other, I wonder if he thinks this is somewhat strange?

    I’m not suprised we were in the same ballpark as each other, but given our personalities and social viewpoints, I would have figured we’d be found at least somewhat further to the right…?

    When I saw my result, I stated above I bet it would be significantly different if more foreign policy-type questions were asked.

    I’ve always considered myself centrist on domestic policy. I think the government has a responsibility to the people far beyond security, but I also grew to believe the government needed to be MUCH more efficient in how it trys to help us all - and that usually means wacking away at the bureacracy.

    And on foreign policy and defense issues, I’ve always been conservative.

    And on questions of moral values, I am personally conservative and Christian, but I prefer the government limit how much it gets involved in those values (including the courts deciding cases for the ACLU on whether this or that local community school district can have “Christmas” on its school calendar)…

  4. Matt@Occidentalism.org

    OK, I took the test, which I remember taking a few years ago. I think the result is almost the same, too.

    http://www.occidentalism.org/pic/mattpoliticalcompass.jpg

    Right and somewhat libertarian.

  5. Matt@Occidentalism.org

    I also did the other test.

    Your Type is
    ENTJ
    Extroverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
    Strength of the preferences %
    33 38 1 1

    I am not sure what to think of the results, really.

  6. usinkorea

    Went back for the psychology test
    Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging
    56 38 12 22

    I have no idea what it means. I would think these tests would have a hard time nailing me down, because I have found I have cycles (—but not manic-depressive—-). Sometimes I like getting involved. Sometimes I like taking time away from things. I prefer planning things out, but I’m better than many of my friends and co-workers over the years at adjusting on the fly….

  7. Richardson

    James,
    From an E to an I? Country living doing it? Might change if you took it again, XNTJ. I’m almost off the chart I.

    If I took the political test again and reinterpreted some of the questions, I’m sure I’d score more conservative and a bit more authoritarian. If I had a chance I’d reengineer some of the questions, which I guess would be natural for an INTJ.

  8. Richardson

    USinKorea wrote;

    And on questions of moral values, I am personally conservative and Christian, but I prefer the government limit how much it gets involved in those values…

    I’m similar - I don’t like to see laws made for things that people ought to know better than to do. But realize sometimes we need to make those laws. Same thing with government intervention in society overall, making me something of a mix between neocon and realist thought.

    Also, INFJ is referred to as the “Counselor” type:

    The Counselor Idealists are abstract in thought and speech, cooperative in reaching their goals, and enterprising and attentive in their interpersonal roles. Counselors focus on human potentials, think in terms of ethical values, and come easily to decisions. The small number of this type (little more than 2 percent) is regrettable, since Counselors have an unusually strong desire to contribute to the welfare of others and genuinely enjoy helping their companions. [more]

  9. Richardson

    Matt,
    As an ENTJ, perhaps you should consider a military career?

    Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition, it is marshalling or situational organizing role that reaches the highest development in Fieldmarshals. As this kind of role is practiced some contingency organizing is necessary, so that the second suit of the Fieldmarshal’s intellect is devising contingency plans. [more]

  10. usinkorea

    So, I’m a 2%er….???

    cooperative in reaching their goals — they nevertheless work quite intensely with those close to them, quietly exerting their influence behind the scenes

    Well, for me, that works OK unless the group I’m a part of gets to where it seems like it isn’t going to achieve any goals….I don’t like to be the leader in groups, but when it turns to crap, I have a habit of not exactly “quietly” exerting influence……I either take over, break off and do my own thing, or give up………not something that seems to happen a lot out in the real world, but something that seemed to happen a good bit in college and high school “group projects”…

    They have an unusually rich inner life, but they are reserved and tend not to share their reactions except with those they trust. With their loved ones, certainly, Counselors are not reluctant to express their feelings, their face lighting up with the positive emotions, but darkening like a thunderhead with the negative.

    I would have thought from my answers on some of the questions, this wouldn’t have been me either. I would think both people who’ve read my blog and commenting over the years, and others who’ve talked to me in person, would say I’m not “reserved” but rather share my reactions and emotions openly…

    That is one thing that drives my wife crazy. I am pretty much an open book when it comes to talking face to face with people I’m around or expressing things on the blogs.

    they tend to be private people, mutely withdrawing from human contact.

    I doubt many would consider me private or mutely….when I have to have significant amounts of human contact….

    What was the scale on this test?

    I see where my lowest score (12) was on the “feeling” to “thinking” line, and from reading over the “Mastermind” link, I’d place myself closer some of that as far as my group participation habits that the “Counselor” brief stated. But again —- to me, I think it would depend on the time period in which you observed me or for how long this or that project would last.

    But, now that I think about it, I might like it better being in a group with Gandhi and Elanore Roosevelt than Einstein and Margaret Thatcher. I mean, I like Thatcher, but she’s no Gandhi…

  11. Richardson

    You’ve hit upon the problem with the type explanations; they’re all positive but leave out the negative aspects of some of those people most often display, and thus the whole picture. Also, the 12 on “feeling” means you’re very close to being an INXJ, or in-between the Feeling and Thinking types, which also explains some of the disparity between their description and reality. Take the test again in a month and see where it puts you (if you start wearing a robe, it could reinforce the INFJ, though).

  12. usinkorea

    I sit around a lot in my underware and don’t each much, does that count? (I am up to about 180 pounds now whereas in Hawaii I was around 140…)

    I am thankful, though, I wasn’t in a group headed by Bill Moyers and Joan Baez!

  13. usinkorea

    My mother just heard what I rated on both and said it is full of shit…

  14. Richardson

    On #12, too much information!
    Send the test links to your Mom!

  15. James Na

    Richardson:

    I was highly extroverted most of my life. However, in the last few years, I have grown intensely misanthropic.

    I think my exurban living is a manifestation of that rather than a cause.

    Perhaps working in the industry of politics finally did me in.

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting